Longform AI agentsAboutFree trial

Answers

What is biological age, and can a test measure it?

A birthday gives you one number. Biological age is researchers’ attempt at a second one, built in more than one way.

Arun Verma, co-founder of Triangle · 2026-10-17

This is not clinical evidence and not medical advice. It does not replace your care team. Discuss anything here with your clinician before you act on it.

What is biological age, and can a test measure it?

Researchers use “biological age” for an estimate of how much damage, physiological change and loss of function a person’s cells have accumulated over time, as opposed to the years since birth. They estimate it in several ways, including patterns of DNA chemistry and sets of biomarkers. NIA describes epigenetic clocks, the DNA-based approach, as tools used by researchers. As researcher Morgan Levine puts it, biological age is often defined in one dimension, but aging itself is multidimensional. The two approaches start from different measurements: DNA methylation patterns in one case and biomarker levels in the other.

How is biological age different from chronological age?

Your birthdate gives your chronological age. Biological age is meant to describe the age your cells, tissues and organ systems appear to be, based on biochemistry, NIA explains. The two can differ. When a DNA methylation estimate of someone’s biological age comes out higher than their chronological age, researchers call it epigenetic age acceleration. NIA likens the epigenome, which is affected by environment and experiences over time, to the rings inside a tree, which record a tree’s age and where it met damage or stress.

How is a biological age built from biomarkers?

One approach compares you with an average. NIH Research Matters describes measuring a set of biomarkers and comparing them with what is typical for a given chronological age, using the general population as the reference. In the words of one researcher it quotes, your biomarker levels are lined up against the population average, and you “look about like a 55-year-old.” An NIA-funded researcher, Morgan Levine, used machine learning on big longitudinal studies, such as a CDC health survey, to pick out nine biomarkers that, combined with calendar age, were accurate predictors of future disease risk, functioning and mortality in those studies, NIA reports.

What is an epigenetic clock?

Epigenetic clocks estimate age from DNA methylation: chemical tags called methyl groups that attach at particular spots in DNA and can turn genes on or off. The tags sit on the DNA without changing its sequence, and they can change across a lifetime in response to environmental exposures. The NIA-funded study led by University of Michigan scientists used three types of clocks: first generation (Horvath and Hannum), second generation (GrimAge and PhenoAge) and third generation (DunedinPACE), with the second and third designed to improve on the earlier ones. DunedinPACE, NIH Research Matters says, was built to show how fast someone is aging rather than how much they have aged, using a New Zealand study of more than 1,000 people who had health evaluations between ages 26 and 45.

Do biological age estimates predict health outcomes?

In an NIA-funded study of more than 3,500 Americans age 51 and older, newer clocks were consistently associated with key aging health outcomes, though findings differed somewhat across clock types. Social and behavioral factors, such as demographics and health behaviors, remained stronger predictors than the clocks, with one exception NIA names: having multiple chronic diseases. When combined with other biomarkers, epigenetic age still predicted mortality and multiple chronic diseases, but could not predict functional difficulties or cognitive dysfunction. Earlier, a 2017 NIA report on a study of more than 13,000 people found that the gap between epigenetic age and chronological age predicted mortality risk independent of known risk factors, and it said more research is needed to understand epigenetic aging.

Can a test tell me my own biological age?

NIA describes epigenetic clocks as tools used by researchers, and the study it summarizes analyzed data from more than 3,500 people in the Health and Retirement Study. NIA’s 2024 write-up says the study’s findings suggest that along with traditional social and behavioral predictors of health, epigenetic age measures are a valuable tool for aging research and for predicting health outcomes later in life, and that further research may examine whether age-acceleration predictions differ within different population groups. A fair question for a clinician who knows your history is what any single number would mean for you.

What could I ask about a biological age score I have been given?

You could ask whoever provides a score which biomarkers or sample type it uses, which group of people it was compared with, and whether it has been tested in people of your age and background. MedlinePlus Genetics says patterns of epigenetic modification vary among individuals, in different tissues within an individual, and even in different cells within a tissue. Another question is which clock a score came from; in the NIA-funded study, findings differed somewhat across clock types. A fair question for a clinician is how the score sits next to the lab results you already have, and whether either bears on your care.

Where does the research stand?

NIH Research Matters describes work that measures the aging of individual organs from certain proteins in the blood, and notes that different organs can age at different rates, even in the same person. On epigenetic aging, NIA wrote in 2017 that more research is needed to understand the process and how it affects the contributors to mortality.

Sources

Start your 7-day free trialLongform is made by Triangle. 7-day free trial, then $9 a month. Cancel anytime.